EEA Chpt V ss 34-52 Archives

Damages awarded unlawfully: Harassment & s 60 EEA

by GilesFiles | Nov 10, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Conduct & capability, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, District, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, EEA Chpt VI 53-65, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Evidence & onus, Government, Gross misconduct, Harass & bully, Hearing procedure, Hearsay, Interpretation etc, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 1995, LRA 7: 112-184 Dispute, Orders, Parties, Policies - all, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, State organs, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Settling disputes finally: Special plea upheld

by GilesFiles | May 27, 2021 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Causes and defences, Contractual breach, Courts, Declaratory, EEA 1998, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Judges, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, LRA 1995, LRA 7: 112-184 Dispute, Mutual termination, Orders, Parties, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Sectors, Settlement agreements, Special pleas, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Termination (LRL 8), Topics, Universities and schools | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Gender discrimination considered: Female comparator

by GilesFiles | Sep 9, 2020 | AF - Internal equity external parity, CCMA awards, Courts, EEA 1998, EEA 7 Factors, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Evidence & onus, Government, Insights, Judges, Just and equitable, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Municipal, Orders, Parties, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics, Work Science Institute | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Maternity leave discrimination: Alternative position denied

by GilesFiles | May 18, 2020 | 2020 onwards, Bill of Rights, Courts, Dignity equality freedom, Discrimination (LRL 11), EEA 1998, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Judges, Kate Savage, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, LRA 1995, LRA 7: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 8a: 185-197B Dismissal, Parties, Private enterprises, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Compensation order confusing: Appeal struck off

by GilesFiles | Feb 20, 2020 | 2020 onwards, Appeals, Awards -s145 see also Sidumo, Conduct & capability, Courts, Discrimination (LRL 11), EEA 1998, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, Evidence & onus, F Kathree-Setiloane, Government, Irregular proceeding, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, LRA 1995, LRA 7: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 8a: 185-197B Dismissal, Municipal, Objective - correctness, Orders, Parties, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Sidumo - see also awards s 145, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Struck off, Termination (LRL 8), Topics, Work Science Institute | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Arbitrary grounds considered: Flagging in mining industry?

by GilesFiles | Jan 29, 2020 | Applications, Bill of Rights, CCMA awards, CCMA members, Courts, Declaratory, Dignity equality freedom, EEA 1998, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, Employ Equity (LRL 12), ILO Convention 111/1958, ILO Conventions, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Management, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Risks, Sectors, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Equality Report examined: Binding effect discussed

by GilesFiles | Oct 8, 2019 | 2019, André van Niekerk, Bill of Rights, Central, Courts, Dignity equality freedom, Discrimination (LRL 11), EEA 1998, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Judges, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Parties, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics, Trade unions | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Retirement age considered: Agreed or normal?

by GilesFiles | Oct 26, 2016 | 2020 onwards, Applications, AUD, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Discrimination (LRL 11), EEA 1998, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Just and equitable, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 1995, LRA 8a: 185-197B Dismissal, Orders, Parties, Personal services, Private enterprises, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Sean Snyman, Sectors, Selected judges, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

HEB v Finkelstein t/a Finkelstein and Associates Can employers terminate employment simply because a certain age is considered to be a retirement age even when there is no agreement nor proof of a normal retirement age?...

Facial cosmetic impairment discrimination: Damages and compensation

by GilesFiles | Sep 23, 2016 | 2016, AUD, Conduct & capability, Courts, Discrimination (LRL 11), EEA 1998, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Illness & injury, Inherent requirements, Judges, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, LRA 1995, LRA 7: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 8a: 185-197B Dismissal, Protect not punish, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Risks, Sean Snyman, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Termination (LRL 8), Topics, Trust & confidence | 2 |

S v Kit Kat Group (Pty) Ltd (JS787/14) [2016] ZALCJHB 362 ; [2016] 12 BLLR 1239 ; (2017) ILJ 483 (23 September 2016) per S Snyman AJ and refused leave to appeal on 2 December 2016. The LC held that the employer had discriminated...

Category: EEA Chpt V ss 34-52