Category: Polygraph test

Racial harassment condemned: Employer vicariously liable

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Threatening fellow employees: Reliance on polygraph test?

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Harassment and vicarious liability: Claim not proved

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Performance standards contravened: Hearsay evidence

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Trust relationship destroyed: Reason valid and fair

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Distrusting polygraph test: No direct evidence

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Considering polygraph test: Condition of employment?

Colven Associates George CC v CCMA (PR49/2012) [2015] ZALCPE 26 (22 April 2015) per A van Niekerk J. The Labour Court upheld the reason for a dismissal as being valid and fair after reviewing and setting aside an award.  The...

Read More

Polygraph test disputed: Expert evidence required?

DHL Supply Chain (Pty) Ltd v De Beer NO Does a failed polygraph test which is disputed really produce any usable information that is reliable? “[30] These considerations beg the question about what a failed polygraph test...

Read More

Polygraph test: Expert evidence required

DHL Supply Chain (Pty) Ltd v NBCRFI (DA4/2013) [2014] ZALAC 15; [2014] 9 BLLR 860; (2014) 35 ILJ 2379 (LAC) (13 May 2014) per Sutherland AJA [Ndlovu JA and Molemela AJA concurring] Appeal disallowed with costs. LAC Summary:...

Read More

Derivative misconduct examined: Fair reason to dismiss

Num obo Besent v Grogan NO (RSA Geological Services, division of De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd) (JA30/08) [2010] ZALAC 12 [2010] JOL 25713 (LAC) (1 June 2010) per McCall AJA [Davis JA and Hendricks AJA concurring] The Labour...

Read More
Loading