Category: 2015

Public service resignations: Determining notice period

Public service employees require special attention.  A calendar month is regarded as ‘one of the 12 periods of time in which the calendar is divided’.  This is according to Black’s Law Dictionary (7th ed, 1999). The Public...

Read More

Pay progression: Within scope of collective agreement

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Unlawful competition restraint: Enforced to prevent selling

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Fair reason dishonesty: No proof required

An employer’s evidence may assist in assessing the effect of misconduct on the trust relationship.  But a breakdown of trust may be inferred from the nature of the misconduct, particularly if serious or gross. So arbiters must...

Read More

Conditional resignation: Position subject to funding

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Lawfulness and fairness: Tension relating to dismissals

James v Eskom Holdings BPK (C881/2014) [2015] ZALCCT 70 (7 December 2015) per Steenkamp J. The Labour Court was bound by the LAC judgment in Edcon v Steenkamp  [2015] 6 BLLR 549 (LAC) and could no longer wait for the final...

Read More

Tasting policy: Unfair dismissal despite valid reason

Pick ‘n Pay Retailers (Pty) Ltd v CCMA (C1083/14) [2015] ZALCCT 73 (3 December 2015) per Rabkin-Naicker J. The Commissioner found that the dismissal of the employee was substantively unfair and reinstated her with effect...

Read More

Obviously wrong: Review test for reasonable award

The Labour Court reviewed and set aside a reinstatement award after deciding that the employee was ‘guilty of misconduct’.  The award was ‘obviously wrong’.  It related to a conflict of interest in the appointment of...

Read More
Loading