GilesFiles, Author at GilesFiles

Free expression examined: No absolute constitutional rights

Posted by GilesFiles | Nov 27, 2020 | 2020, appeal, Appeals, Bill of Rights, Central, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Courts, Declaratory, Dignity equality freedom, Government, Interpretation and application, Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Legal Practice, Legislation, MTR Mogoeng, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Sectors, Topics |

Economic Freedom Fighters v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services Constitutional Court examined free expression and emphasised that a less restrictive means of proscribing constitutionally objectionable incitement is the...

Date dispute arises: Ongoing cause of action

Posted by GilesFiles | Nov 24, 2020 | 2020, Acting LAC judges, appeal, Appeals, Applications, Cause: general, Common Law, Condonation, Courts, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, Employment Equity (LRL 12), Employment Equity Act 1998, Exceptions/special pleas, Granted, John Murphy, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, Labour Relations Act 1995, LAC judges, Legal Practice, LRA Chpt: 7: s112-184 Dispute resolution, Manufacturing, Orders, Parties, prescription, Private enterprises, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2) - work law, Topics |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Medical benefits capped: legitimate commercial rationale

Posted by GilesFiles | Nov 24, 2020 | 2020, Acting LAC judges, Appeals, Applications, BCEA 1997, BCEA 77(3) and 77A(e), Benefits - 186(2)(a), Cause: contractual breach, Cause: general, Common Law, Courts, Declaratory, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), Interpretation and application, John Murphy, Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Labour Appeal Court, Labour practices (LRL 9), Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, LRA Chpt: 7: s112-184 Dispute resolution, Objective or correct, Orders, Orders re costs, Parties, Private enterprises, Review tests, Sectors, Statement of claim, Statutes (LRL 2) - work law, Topics, Trade |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Unprotected strike interdicted: Collective agreement terms

Posted by GilesFiles | Nov 18, 2020 | 2020, Applications, Appointed LC judges, Bill of Rights, Collective agreements, Collective Bargaining (LRL 5), Courts, Declaratory, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), Edwin Tlhotlhalemaje, Granted, Interdicts and rule nisi, Interpretation and application, Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Labour Court, Labour court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Labour Relations Act 1995, Legal Practice, LRA Chpt: 4: s64-77 Strikes & lockouts, LRA Chpt: 7: s112-184 Dispute resolution, Manufacturing, Orders, Parties, Power plays (LRL 6), Rules and practice manuals, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2) - work law, Strike - unprotected, Topics, Trade unions, Urgency |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Temporary incapacity leave: Refused but no urgency

Posted by GilesFiles | Nov 11, 2020 | 2020, Applications, Appointed LC judges, Central, Courts, Declaratory, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), Edwin Tlhotlhalemaje, Government, Interdicts and rule nisi, Interpretation and application, Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Labour Relations Act 1995, Legal Practice, LRA Chpt: 7: s112-184 Dispute resolution, Orders, Organs of state, Parties, Refused, Review tests, Rules and practice manuals, Sectors, State action - s158(1)(h), Statutes (LRL 2) - work law, Topics, Urgency |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Author: GilesFiles

Free expression examined: No absolute constitutional rights

Date dispute arises: Ongoing cause of action

Medical benefits capped: legitimate commercial rationale

Unprotected strike interdicted: Collective agreement terms

Temporary incapacity leave: Refused but no urgency