Nel v Ramwell t/a Ramwell Attorneys Hearing oral evidence cannot be applied for after it becomes clear that the main application will not succeed and this is an interesting example of a cyber crime involving an attorney....
Read MoreFor subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...
Read MoreFor subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...
Read MoreDefining biological characteristics: In Rahube v Rahube (CCT 319/17) [2018] ZACC 202 (30 October 2018) the constitutional court helpfully explained the difference between the words ‘sex’ and ‘gender’...
Read MorePrivacy rights were considered in detail, including the nature and scope of the right to privacy, by the Constitutional Court in the recent judgment concerning the possession and use of cannabis. Extracts from the judgment are...
Read MoreFor subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...
Read MoreMy Vote Counts NPC v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services The constitutional court’s unanimous judgment on funding political parties is important in many respects and will surely give rise to an informed debate...
Read MoreMoyo v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development; Sonti v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services The SCA decision is significant because it is also relevant to the rights of employees who are faced with...
Read MoreFines for violating provisions of the GDPR must be effective reasonable dissuasive and strict vicarious liability is not imposed, unlike section 99(2) of the Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 (POPIA) which reads:...
Read MoreThe ne bis in idem principle (prohibiting double jeopardy) is applied in various international instruments such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Literally translated it means ‘not twice about the same’. In ...
Read MoreThe right to decide what to disclose about oneself is called by Germans informational self-determination according to an article by Hannah Kuchler, an FT correspondent in San Francisco, and published in the FT over the weekend:...
Read MoreFor subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...
Read More