MEC: Health, WC v Coetzee Scare skills allowance issue now before the Constitutional Court after nearly 15 years of disagreement about whether the Agreement applied to medical specialists who were employed by two Cape...
Read MoreFor subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...
Read MoreAscendis Animal Health (Pty) Ltd v Merck Sharpe Dohme Corporation Res judicata examined and Constitutional Court failed to achieve a majority decision which meant that the judgment of the high court was not overturned. ...
Read MoreMoyo v Minister of Police; Sonti v Minister of Police Unconstitutional intimidation provisions considered including difference between ‘reading-in’ and ‘reading-down’ which avoids inconsistency between...
Read MoreGelyke Kanse v University of Stellenbosch Indigenous minority languages considered by the Constitutional Court and decided that it was “impossible to set aside or override its conclusion that it was not reasonably...
Read MoreGelyke Kanse v University of Stellenbosch Indigenous minority languages considered by the Constitutional Court and decided that it was “impossible to set aside or override its conclusion that it was not reasonably...
Read MoreMoodley v Kenmont School Attaching state assets considered and Constitutional Court declined to confirm the declaration by the High Court of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Local Division, Durban that section 58A(4) of the South...
Read MorePresident of RSA v Democratic Alliance Executive decisions considered and constitutional court refused to advise or guide the president courts should be “loath to fulfil an advisory role, particularly for the benefit of...
Read MoreFreedom of Religion SA v Justice and Constitutional Development Chastisement defence considered by constitutional court and decision of high court upheld and confirmed that the common law defence regarded as constitutionally...
Read MoreDykema v Malebane (Bela-Bela) Legal consequences considered and the constitutional court decided the “most coherent, sensible and fair conclusion, based on an interpretation which is sensitive to text, context and...
Read MoreMwelase v DG: Department of Rural Development and Land Reform Land reform considered and the Land Claims Court directed itself properly and scrupulously to the facts before it which showed failing institutional functionality of...
Read MorePublic Protector v SA Reserve Bank Personal indemnity exceeded and Constitutional Court confirmed that the Public Protector acted in bad faith and held that in any event, the ambit of the immunity afforded under section 5(3) is...
Read More