PAJA 2000 Archives | GilesFiles

Pay progression differentiation: Incentive Policy Framework

by GilesFiles | Nov 9, 2020 | 2020 +, appeal, Appeals, Appointed LAC judges, Bill of Rights, Central, Courts, Dignity equality freedom, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, Employment Equity (LRL 12), Government, Granted, Interpretation and application, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, Labour Relations Act 1995, LAC judges, Legal Practice, LRA Chpt: 7: s112-184 Dispute resolution, Objective or correct, Orders, Organs of state, PAJA 2000, Parties, Private enterprises, Review tests, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2) - work law, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Virus practice code: Mining and Covid-19

by GilesFiles | May 4, 2020 | 2020 +, André van Niekerk, Applications, Appointed LC judges, Bill of Rights, Biowatch principle, Central, Courts, Declaratory, Dignity equality freedom, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), Employment Relations (LRL 1), Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Labour Relations Act 1995, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA Chpt: 7: s112-184 Dispute resolution, LRA Chpt: 8a: s185-197B Dismissals, Orders, Orders re costs, Organisations (LRL 4), PAJA 2000, Parties, Private enterprises, Review tests, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2) - work law, Topics, Zungu doctrine | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Lawful administrative action: HC refuses review application

by GilesFiles | May 4, 2020 | 2020 +, Bill of Rights, Cause: statute, Central, Common Law, Courts, Declaratory, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Review tests, Rules and practice manuals, Sectors, Topics, Uniform High Court | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Adjusting levies considered: Exclusive use of gardens areas

by GilesFiles | Mar 6, 2020 | 2020 +, appeal, Appeals, Body corporates, Cause: statute, Common Law, Community housing schemes, Courts, Granted, High Court, High Court judges, Judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Review tests, Rules and practice manuals, Sectors, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Municipal manager appointments: Mootness

by GilesFiles | Nov 21, 2019 | 2019, appeal, Appeals, Bill of Rights, Common law review, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Courts, JC Froneman, Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Municipal, Municipal managers, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Refused, Review tests, Rules and practice manuals, Sectors, State self-reviews, Topics, Uniform High Court | 0 |

Notyawa v Makana Municipality Municipal manager appointments examined and found that leave to appeal had to be refused because in the concurring judgment of Froneman J the issues were already moot and no purpose would be...

Municipal manager appointments: Leave refused

by GilesFiles | Nov 21, 2019 | 2019, appeal, Appeals, Bill of Rights, Biowatch principle, Common law review, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Courts, Government, JC Froneman, Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Municipal, Municipal managers, Orders, Orders re costs, PAJA 2000, Parties, Refused, Review tests, Rules and practice manuals, Sectors, Topics, Uniform High Court | 0 |

Notyawa v Makana Municipality Municipal manager appointments examined and found that leave to appeal had to be refused because there were no prospects of success and the discretion had been properly exercised by the high ...

Deployment decision reviewed: Collective agreement

by GilesFiles | Oct 16, 2019 | 2019, Acting LAC judges, Bill of Rights, Common law review, Courts, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), John Murphy, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Orders re costs, Organs of state, PAJA 2000, Parties, Review tests, State action - s158(1)(h), Statutes (LRL 2) - work law, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Regulation unlawfully promulgated: Warring with rule of law

by GilesFiles | Oct 16, 2019 | 2019, Appeals, Appointed LAC judges, Associations, Bill of Rights, Central, Common Law, Courts, Dennis Davis, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), Exceptions/special pleas, issue estoppel, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, PAJA 2000, Parties, Res judicata, Review tests, Sectors, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Mineral resources regulations: Power to regulate

by GilesFiles | Jul 4, 2019 | 2019, Bill of Rights, Courts, Judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, PAJA 2000, philosophy / economics, SCA judges, Sectors, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics | 0 |

Minister of Mineral Resources v Stern; Treasure the Karoo Action Group v Department of Mineral Resources Mineral resources regulations set aside in their entirety by the SCA irrespective of whether PAJA or the principle of...

Parliamentary investigation examined: Refusal to set aside

by GilesFiles | Jun 19, 2019 | 2019, A.G. Binns-Ward, Common Law, Courts, High Court, High Court judges, Interdicts and rule nisi, Judges, PAJA 2000, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Reinstatement factors considered: Administrative action

by GilesFiles | Jun 13, 2019 | 2019, Acting LAC judges, Common Law, Courts, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), John Murphy, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, LRA Chpt: 7: s112-184 Dispute resolution, Operation of law, PAJA 2000, Provincial, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2) - work law, Termination & dismissal (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Legal questions considered: Jurisdiction of adjudicator

by GilesFiles | May 13, 2019 | 2019, appeal, Body corporates, Cause: statute, Common Law, Community housing schemes, Courts, Granted, High Court, High Court judges, Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Legal Practice, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Review tests, Sectors, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Category: PAJA 2000