Category: SCA judges

Experts joint minutes: Agreeing facts and opinions

HAL obo MML v MEC for Health, Free State SCA confirmed the position regarding joint minutes of experts “In accordance with Bee, if they agree on issues of fact and the appropriate approach to technical analysis, the...

Read More

Validating void disposition: Interpreting Companies Act

Pride Milling Company (Pty) Ltd v Bekker NO Validating void disposition considered by SCA which also decided “that given the effect of s 341(2), a party approaching a court and seeking that the court order otherwise would...

Read More

Eviction just and equitable: Relationship breached

Nimble Investments (Pty) Ltd v JM In considering whether an eviction order would be just and equitable and by a majority decision the SCA confirmed there were two issues. “The first is whether an order for the eviction of...

Read More

Reviewing ombud decision: No discretion exercised

Ombud for Financial Services Providers v CS Brokers CC Reviewing ombud decision but SCA decided that it was difficult to discern which factors weighed and occupied the Ombud’s mind when the decision was given and the SCA...

Read More

Unlawful occupation considered: Just and equitable remedy

Grobler v Phillips Unlawful occupation considered by SCA and pointed out that during the greater part of occupation the property formed part of a farm but gradually the farm became absorbed by the growth of urban developments...

Read More

Bringing constitutional challenge: Specificity and clarity

Minister of Cooperative Governance & Traditional Affairs v De Beer Bringing constitutional challenge considered by SCA and in allowing the appeal it was stated in para [116] ‘The constitutional challenge made to the...

Read More

Dispute resolution process: Adjudication and arbitration

Sasol SA (Pty) Ltd v Murray & Roberts Ltd Dispute resolution process explained and high court confirmed that ‘the adjudicator’s decision is binding on the parties unless and until revised by the tribunal and is...

Read More

Publishing defamatory statements: Unlawfulness?

Malema v Rawula In considering publishing defamatory statements the SCA disallowed the appeal from the high court and confirmed that an interdict must always be directed at future conduct and if there is no risk of future...

Read More

Publishing defamatory statements: Truth and public interest

Malema v Rawula In considering publishing defamatory statements the SCA disallowed the appeal from the high court and confirmed that an interdict must always be directed at future conduct and if there is no risk of future...

Read More

Repudiating insurance contract: Death not covered

Discovery Life Ltd v Hogan Cancelling debit order to pay premium construed by SCA as repudiating insurance contract and insurer cancelled the cover and was no longer on risk and held that insurer was ‘oblivious to the fact...

Read More

Business rescue practitioners: No conflict of interest

Oakbay Investments (Pty) Ltd v Tegeta Exploration and Resources (Pty) Ltd Considering possible conflict of interest by business rescue practitioners SCA stated that “An examination of the sub-sections of s 139(2) reveals...

Read More

Defining financial product: Identify before determination

Impact Financial Consultants CC v Bam NO (Ombud) In defining the nature of a financial product the SCA stated that the Ombud’s approach to the application of common law principles in the determination of a complaint and...

Read More
Loading