Category: 2020 +

Defining financial product: Identify before determination

Impact Financial Consultants CC v Bam NO (Ombud) In defining the nature of a financial product the SCA stated that the Ombud’s approach to the application of common law principles in the determination of a complaint and...

Read More

BBBEE claims considered: Compliance with scheme

Minister of Trade and Industry v Murendi Properties and Building Supplies (Pty) Ltd BBBEE claims considered and primary issue was whether Murendi had met all the qualifying requirements for the payment of a grant awarded to it...

Read More

Testing reasonable prospects: Remote or reasonable chance

Ramakatsa v African National Congress The importance of this matter and testing reasonable prospects of an appeal compelled the SCA to grant leave to appeal and emphasised that ‘no doubt can exist that the ANC just like...

Read More

Collateral reactive challenge: Time-barring considered

National Credit Regulator v Getbucks (Pty) Ltd SCA in dealing with a collateral reactive challenge pointed out that the National Credit Act grants the Minister the power to promulgate regulations but this was done the day before...

Read More

Incompetent nullity declaration: Hate speech claim

Solidarity v Black First Land First (BLF) SCA made an incompetent nullity declaration anfter deciding that the high court should have taken time to consider Qwelane and rendered its judgment so as to decide the case and could...

Read More

Recruitment age discrimination: Differentiation justified

SA Navy v Tebeila Institute of Leadership, Education, Governance and Training In allowing the appeal the SCA in dealing with recruitment and alleged upper age discrimination referred to the policy which explains that the defence...

Read More

Funds wrongfully misappropriated: Legal duty to third parties

FirstRand Bank Ltd v Spar Group Ltd SCA considered case where funds were wrongfully misappropriated and decided that although disbursements from the bank accounts by a customer were not a breach of fiduciary duty they were...

Read More

Producing relevant documents: Uniform Rule 35(12) applied

Democratic Alliance v Mkhwebane With regard to the onus and producing relevant documents the SCA confirmed that the term onus is not to be confused with the burden to adduce evidence (for example, that a document is privileged...

Read More

Employment related injuries: Employer and vicarious liability

Churchill v Premier of Mpumalanga SCA in resolving work related injuries confirmed that ‘there is no bright line test and the enquiry is always whether the statutory requirement that the accident arose out of the...

Read More

Trade mark confusion: Determining possible deception?

Swatch AG (Swatch SA) v Apple Inc SCA dealt with trade mark confusion and outlined the relevant considerations when comparing two marks to determine whether they are deceptively or confusingly similar and referred to...

Read More

Court contempt considered: Onus not discharged

Ndabeni v OR Tambo District Municipality SCA considered contempt of court and decided that respondents had not provided any explanation for the failure to apply resolution 10/11 to the appellant and this grave omission left a...

Read More

Unprofessional conduct considered: Council practice watchdog

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More
Loading