Landmark Judgments of South Africa

Landmark Judgments

Access the landmark judgments of South Africa immediately. On the page below are the judgments that we believe break new ground or contribute significantly to the development of the understanding and appreciation of the law.  These are the landmark judgments in the topics that we monitor and are listed in chronological order. We use our years of knowledge and experience to pick out those judgments that we believe are landmark judgments. Every interested person should have at least read our understanding of these landmark judgments.

Subscribe

Subscribe to GilesFiles for quick, easy access to the very latest court judgments on specific topics. You may cancel at any time.

Freedom of expression: Scandal not defamation

Mtyhopo v South African Municipal Workers Union National Provident Fund (CCT 48/15) [2015] ZACC 32 (1 October 2015) per Cameron J [unanimous] Today the Constitutional Court allowed an appeal and unanimously held that the appellant and his group were entitled to feel...

Toll roads: Sanral decision set aside

City of Cape Town v South African National Roads Agency Ltd (6165/2012) [2015] ZAWCHC 135 (30 September 2015) per Binns-Ward and Boqwana JJ. The High Court partially granted the application and reviewed and set aside Sanral’s purported decision made in terms of s...

Common law ownership: flexible and equitable principles

City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v Link Africa (Pty) Ltd (CCT184/14) [2015] ZACC 29 (23 September 2015) per Cameron J and Froneman J. Order: On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria)...

Fair unlawful dismissals: ConCourt to decide

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login, email us and we’ll arrange to give you...

Forensic report privileged: Nature and extent

Du Toit v Stellenbosch University (10332/2014) [2015] ZAWCHC 126 (8 September 2015) per O Rogers J. In terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 the High Court compelled the University to provide a forensic report to the applicant concerning...

Interpretation of contract: Intention and authority

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login, email us and we’ll arrange to give you...

Occupational injuries examined: Claims against State?

Minister of Defence and Military Veterans v Thomas (CCT168/14) [2015] ZACC 26 (2015) ILJ 2751 ; [2015] JOL 33707 (25 August 2015) per Froneman J (Mogoeng CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Cameron J, Jafta J, Khampepe J, Madlanga J, Molemela AJ, Nkabinde J, Theron AJ and Tshiqi AJ...

Statutory interpretation: Mandatory constitutional canon

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login, email us and we’ll arrange to give you...

Tacit contractual terms: Arising from working practices

Sterklewies (Pty) Ltd t/a Harrismith Feedlot v Msimanga (456/2011) [2012] ZASCA 77; 2012 (5) SA 392 (SCA); [2012] 3 All SA 655 (SCA) (25 May 2012) per Wallis JA at para [22] "It is trite that the terms of a contract of employment are frequently to be distilled from...

Statutory interpretation: Constitutionality and ‘reading-in’

Provincial Minister for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, Western Cape v Municipal Council of the Oudtshoorn Municipality (CCT05/15) [2015] ZACC 24 (18 August 2015) per Molemela AJ: (Mogoeng CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Cameron J, Froneman J,...