Category: 2018

Asylum seeker applications: Principle of non-refoulement

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Operational needs considered: Flexible working hours

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Defining biological characteristics: Sex and gender

Defining biological characteristics: In Rahube v Rahube (CCT 319/17) [2018] ZACC 202 (30 October 2018) the constitutional court helpfully explained the difference between the words ‘sex’ and ‘gender’...

Read More

Undemocratic era relics: Discriminatory irrational differentiation

Holomisa v Holomisa Undemocratic era relics confronted and declared unconstitutional because they were discriminatory “This case concerns the discriminatory oddity that women married out of community of property under the...

Read More

Status of directives: Review under PAJA or legality?

Ahmed v Minister of Home Affairs Status of directives considered and to the extent that Immigration Directive 21 of 2015 [3 February 2016]: imposes a blanket ban on asylum seekers from applying for visas without provision for an...

Read More

Contractual interpretation endorsed: Wallis JA in Edumeni

Airports Company SA v Big Five Duty Free (Pty) Ltd Contractual and statutory interpretation endorsed by Constitutional Court after various approaches applied in the past and it seems that ‘text and context’ are all...

Read More
Loading