Health Professions Act 56 of 1974 Archives

Disclosing medical information: Privacy rights considered

by GilesFiles | Jun 27, 2023 | 2020 onwards, Appeals, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Contractual breach, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Dignity equality freedom, Evidence & onus, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Provincial, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, State organs, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

MEC: Health Gauteng Province v RS Is confidentiality lost in respect of patient medical information if it is contained in public records? “57. This brings to the fore the question whether confidentiality is lost in...

Inexcusable delayed hearing: Final interdict granted

by GilesFiles | Mar 30, 2023 | 2020 onwards, AB1 - Fairness principle or concept, Applications, Associations/corporates, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, General, Granted, High Court, High Court judges, Interdicts & rules, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Orders, Parties, Personal services, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutory, staying proceedings, Topics | 0 |

Dr A v Health Professions Council of SA What should courts do when there is an inexcusable delayed hearing against doctor concerning alleged unprofessional medical conduct? ’84. I also agree that if one considers the...

Professional practice rights: Pending appeal?

by GilesFiles | Nov 8, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Associations/corporates, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Common law, Consumer protection, Contractual breach, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, Granted, HC Uniform, High Court, High Court judges, Interdicts & rules, Interim relief, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Personal services, Regulations, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutory, staying proceedings, Topics, Urgency | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Apprehension of irreparable harm: Well-grounded?

by GilesFiles | May 30, 2022 | 2020 onwards, A G Binns-Ward, Applications, Causes and defences, Central, Costs, Costs awarded, Courts, Damages, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Interdicts & rules, Interim relief, Interpretation etc, Judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Personal services, Refused, Regulations, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, State Owned Enterprises, Statutory, staying proceedings, Topics, Urgency | 0 |

E v The Health Professionals Council of SA When is there a genuine apprehension of irreparable harm that requires a court to stay an investigation into alleged unethical conduct? “[43] All of this leads me to conclude that...

Precautionary suspension upheld: Rational lawful decision

by GilesFiles | Mar 15, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Dignity equality freedom, Evidence & onus, General, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Interdicts & rules, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Refused, Review tests, Sectors, State organs, Topics | 0 |

Motau v Minister of Health When is it rational and lawful to suspend a senior executive as a precaution against the risk of possible harm to the enterprise? “[32] It is common cause that the First Respondent is an organ of...

Unprofessional conduct considered: Practice watchdog?

by GilesFiles | Jan 15, 2021 | 2020 onwards, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Associations/corporates, Common law, Courts, Fair procedure, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Personal services, Review tests, SCA judges, Sectors, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Tag: Health Professions Act 56 of 1974

Disclosing medical information: Privacy rights considered

Inexcusable delayed hearing: Final interdict granted

Professional practice rights: Pending appeal?

Apprehension of irreparable harm: Well-grounded?

Precautionary suspension upheld: Rational lawful decision

Unprofessional conduct considered: Practice watchdog?