Age discrimination proved: damages and compensation

Posted by GilesFiles | Jun 19, 2014 | 2014 and earlier, 2015 and earlier, Airline pilots, Appeals, AUD, Bill of Rights, Courts, Dignity equality freedom, Discrimination (LRL 11), EEA 1998, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Equal outcomes, ILO Convention 111/1958, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Landmark judgments, Legal Practice, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 08a: 185-197B Dismissal, LRA 1995, P Coppin, philosophy / economics, Practices (LRL 9), Retirement, Review tests, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Termination (LRL 8), Topics, Transport & communication | 1

For subscribers only

Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only.
If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login, email us and we’ll arrange to give you access.
You can subscribe by paying a reasonable monthly fee. You can cancel at any time. No fixed contracts.

You can read a summary of a landmark judgment to see what a judgment summary looks like.
We provide free access to landmark judgments.
You can also read more about Gilesfiles and who subscribes to GilesFiles and why.

1 Comment

GilesFiles on March 3, 2015 at 6:37 pm

Reported [2014] 8 BLLR 748; (2014) 35 ILJ 2774 (LAC)
Cited in Du Toit et al Labour Relations Law: A comprehensive guide 6th edn (2015)
at 189, 246, 530, 532, 658, 661, 662, 675, 683, 719

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Age discrimination proved: damages and compensation

For subscribers only

Subscribe

1 Comment

Leave a reply