Restraints unintended consequences: Enforceable and lawful?

Posted by GilesFiles | Jan 12, 2021 | 2020 +, Applications, Bill of Rights, Cause: contractual breach, Common Law, Competition, Courts, Declaratory, Granted, High Court, High Court judges, Insights, Interdicts and rule nisi, Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Legal Practice, Logistics, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Protectable business interests, Public policy, Restraints and restrictions, Sectors, Special pleas, Topics, Transport & communication, Urgency | 0

For subscribers only

Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only.
If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login, email us and we’ll arrange to give you access.
You can subscribe by paying a reasonable monthly fee. You can cancel at any time. No fixed contracts.

You can read a summary of a landmark judgment to see what a judgment summary looks like.
We provide free access to landmark judgments.
You can also read more about Gilesfiles and who subscribes to GilesFiles and why.

Restraints unintended consequences: Enforceable and lawful?

For subscribers only

Subscribe