LRA primary objectives: Approach to be followed

Posted by GilesFiles | Dec 4, 2015 | 2015, 2015 and earlier, Bill of Rights, Collective Bargain (LRL 5), Courts, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Relations, Landmark judgments, Legality principle, LRA 1995, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), SCA judges, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics, Words & phrases | 1

For subscribers only

Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only.
If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login, email us and we’ll arrange to give you access.
You can subscribe by paying a reasonable monthly fee. You can cancel at any time. No fixed contracts.

You can read a summary of a landmark judgment to see what a judgment summary looks like.
We provide free access to landmark judgments.
You can also read more about Gilesfiles and who subscribes to GilesFiles and why.

1 Comment

GilesFiles on March 16, 2016 at 5:03 pm

Reports:
[2016] 3 BLLR 284 (SCA)
BLLR headnote:

High Court – Jurisdiction – Court lacking jurisdiction to entertain challenge to extension of collective agreement by Minister of Labour

(2016) 37 ILJ 625 (SCA)

You must be logged in to post a comment.

LRA primary objectives: Approach to be followed

For subscribers only

Subscribe

1 Comment

Leave a reply