retailers Archives - GilesFiles

Premature termination notice: Invalid or possibly unfair?

by GilesFiles | Jan 22, 2016 | 2016, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Contractual breach, Courts, Disallowed, Finance, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legality principle, LRA 1: 1-3 Purpose, LRA 1995, LRA 7: 112-184 Dispute, Operational reasons, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Review tests, RMM Zondo, Roman Dutch law, Sectors, Special pleas, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Premature termination notice: Minority judgment

by GilesFiles | Jan 22, 2016 | 2016, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Contractual breach, Courts, Disallowed, Edwin Cameron, Finance, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legality principle, LRA 1: 1-3 Purpose, LRA 1995, LRA 7: 112-184 Dispute, Operational reasons, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Retired judges, Review tests, Roman Dutch law, Sectors, Special pleas, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

Steenkamp v Edcon Ltd Premature termination notice considered and majority in ConCourt pointed out that when a dismissal is held to be unfair reinstatement is possible but not when it is invalid and this means that employers...

Fair dismissal: Woolworths

by GilesFiles | Aug 9, 2011 | 2014 and earlier, Courts, Dennis Davis, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, LAC judges | 1 |

The recent judgment of the Labour Appeal Court (26 July 2011) records that on or about 10 February 2005 the services of an employee with nearly 23 years service were terminated after she ‘was convicted of the gross...

Team misconduct considered: Collective accountability

by GilesFiles | Apr 7, 2010 | 2014 and earlier, 2015 and earlier, Collective action, Courts, Derivative action, Edwin Cameron, Judges, Labour Appeal Court, Landmark judgments, Misconduct & incapacity, Risks, Termination (LRL 8), Trust & confidence | 0 |

Team misconduct considered: Many retailers are exposed to severe shrinkage of stock in their stores. Very often it is almost impossible to identify precisely which individuals should be held accountable and where necessary...

Tag: retailers

Premature termination notice: Invalid or possibly unfair?

Premature termination notice: Minority judgment

Fair dismissal: Woolworths

Team misconduct considered: Collective accountability