Preferential Procurement Policy FA 5/2000 Archives

Direct access allowed: ConCourt order lacks clarity?

by GilesFiles | May 30, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Disallowed, Evidence & onus, Government, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, leave to appeal, Legal Practice, Legality principle, M Madlanga, Orders, Parties, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Special pleas, State organs, Topics, Uniform HC | 0 |

Minister of Finance v Sakeliga NPC (fka Afribusiness NPC) Constitutional court allowed direct access to consider application to vary earlier order but what does ‘execution’ mean? [13] Plainly, execution of a...

Invalid procurement regulations: Sec 217 of Constitution

by GilesFiles | Feb 16, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Central, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Costs, Courts, Disallowed, Government, Judges, Legal Practice, Legislation, M Madlanga, Orders, Parties, Sectors, State organs, Topics | 0 |

Minister of Finance v Afribusiness NPC Invalid procurement regulations considered by constitutional court and the majority judgment points out that the minority judgment failed to address a conundrum of a possible clash between...

Preferential procurement policy: Irrational unlawful invalid

by GilesFiles | Jan 31, 2020 | 2020 onwards, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Courts, Disallowed, Judges, Lawfulness & fairness, Legal Practice, Logistics, MJD Wallis, Orders, Parties, SCA judges, Sectors, State organs, Statutory, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics, Transport & communication, VM Ponnan | 0 |

Acsa (Airports Co SA Soc Ltd) v Imperial Group Ltd Preferential procurement policy may only be implemented within a framework prescribed by national legislation because of s 217(3) of the Constitution and the only escape for...

Competitive tender bids: Fundamental constitutional requirement

by GilesFiles | Apr 11, 2018 | 2018, Bill of Rights, Courts, High Court, Legislation, Municipal, PAJA 2000, philosophy / economics, Public policy, Sectors, Topics | 0 |

Jocastro (Pty) Ltd v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality Competitive tender bids are essential and “In the present instance, twelve out of fourteen bids were excluded on the basis that they failed to provide information...

Tag: Preferential Procurement Policy FA 5/2000

Direct access allowed: ConCourt order lacks clarity?

Invalid procurement regulations: Sec 217 of Constitution

Preferential procurement policy: Irrational unlawful invalid

Competitive tender bids: Fundamental constitutional requirement