Pension Funds Act Archives

Amending rules retrospectively: Is registration required?

by GilesFiles | Aug 2, 2023 | 2020 onwards, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Causes and defences, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, Finance, Interpretation etc, Judges, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Pension & retirement funds, Review tests, Roman Dutch law, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Invalid investment rule: Retirement fund benefits

by GilesFiles | Feb 20, 2023 | 2020 onwards, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bargaining councils, Causes and defences, Contractual breach, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Interpretation etc, Judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Municipal, Orders, Parties, Pension & retirement funds, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Fake degree certificate: Benefits forfeited

by GilesFiles | Dec 15, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Causes and defences, Conduct & capability, Contractual breach, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, Government, Gross misconduct, High Court, High Court judges, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Regional, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Roman Dutch law, Sectors, State organs, State Owned Enterprises, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Refunding contributions considered: Disallowed appeal

by GilesFiles | Mar 14, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Causes and defences, Central, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Costs, Courts, Disallowed, Government, High Court judges, Interpretation etc, Judges, Legal Practice, Legislation, OL Rogers, Orders, Parties, Pension & retirement funds, Sectors, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Investigate unlawful cancellations: Reviewing decisions

by GilesFiles | Sep 20, 2018 | 2018, Bill of Rights, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Costs, Courts, Judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, PAJA 2000, SV Khampepe, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Charged convicted dismissed: Disputed settlement agreement

by GilesFiles | Jul 10, 2018 | 2018, Appeals, Courts, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, LRA 1995, LRA 7: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 8a: 185-197B Dismissal, Parties, Provincial, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Sectors, Settlement agreements, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Good faith bargaining: Managerial prerogatives

by GilesFiles | Jul 2, 2018 | 2018, André van Niekerk, Applications, BCEA 1997 (LRL 10), BCEA 77(3) & 77A(e), Causes and defences, CCMA Rules, Collective Bargain (LRL 5), Contractual breach, Courts, Evidence & onus, General, Interdicts & rules, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, LC Rules, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 1995, LRA 3: 11-63 Bargain, LRA 7: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 8a: 185-197B Dismissal, LRA D: 151-166 LC, Parties, Prerogative, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Termination (LRL 8), Terms & conditions, Topics, Trade unions, Uniform HC | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Reviewable error: View distribution scheme as a whole

by GilesFiles | Dec 2, 2015 | 2015, Causes and defences, Courts, Interpretation etc, Judges, Labour Relations, Legislation, MJD Wallis, PAJA 2000, Practices (LRL 9), Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Sectors, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics, Words & phrases | 0 |

Tellumat (Pty) Ltd v Appeal Board of the Financial Services Board (221/2015) [2015] ZASCA 202 (2 December 2015) per Wallis JA (Mpati P, Leach and Mathopo JJA and Baartman AJA concurring) The Supreme Court of Appeal allowed the...

Collateral challenge: Amended pension fund rule

by GilesFiles | Nov 26, 2015 | 2015, Appeals, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Courts, Judges, Legal Practice, Legislation, Parties, Pension & retirement funds, Regulations, SCA judges, Statutory, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics | 0 |

South African Local Authorities Pension Fund v Msunduzi Municipality (994/2013) [2015] ZASCA 172 (26 November 2015) per Lewis JA (Ponnan, Theron, Willis and Mathopo JJA concurring) The Supreme Court of Appeal disallowed the...

Pension fund transfer: Assets and liabilities

by GilesFiles | Sep 7, 2015 | 2015, Causes and defences, Courts, Interpretation etc, Judges, Legislation, Parties, Pension & retirement funds, SCA judges, Sectors, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics | 0 |

Sasol Ltd v Chemical Industries National Provident Fund (CINPF) (20612/2014) [2015] ZASCA 113 (7 September 2015) per Gorven AJA (Mpati P, Cachalia and Mhlantla JJA and Baartman AJA concurring). The Supreme Court of Appeal...

Actuarial reserve: administrative decision set aside under PAJA

by GilesFiles | May 27, 2015 | 2015, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Courts, High Court, Judges, Legislation, PAJA 2000, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 1 |

The High Court granted the application under PAJA and set aside a decision of the Appeal Board. The Registrar of Pension Funds rejected the statutory actuarial valuation of the Fund as at 13 September 2007. The Appeal Board...

Tag: Pension Funds Act