Category: DN Unterhalter

Arbitrators’ notes privileged: Disclosure not required

by GilesFiles | Feb 11, 2020 | 2020, 2020, Applications, Bill of Rights, Cause: Bill of Rights, Cause: statute, Common Law, Courts, Declaratory, DN Unterhalter, Evidence and onus, High Court, High Court judges, Interpretation and application, Judges, Jurisdiction and powers, Landmark judgments, Legal Practice, Legal practitioners, Legality principle, Legislation, LRA Chpt: 7: s112-184 Dispute resolution, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Review tests, Rules and practice manuals, Sectors, Topics, Uniform High Court | 0 |

Zamani Marketing and Management Consultants (Pty) Ltd v HCI Invest 15 Holdco (Pty) Ltd Arbitrators notes ‘privileged’ and high court decided that “. . . , as a general matter, the arbitrators’ notes are too...

Preserving information application: Norwich Pharmacal relief granted

by GilesFiles | Jan 31, 2018 | 2018, 2018, Access to information, Anton Piller, Common Law, Consumer protection, Courts, DN Unterhalter, High Court, High Court judges, Judges, Landmark judgments, Legal Practice, Protection of Personal Information, Sectors, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...